15 Shocking Facts About Motor Vehicle Legal

DWQA QuestionsCategory: Questions15 Shocking Facts About Motor Vehicle Legal
Magnolia Vanhoose asked 2 months ago

Motor Vehicle Litigation

If liability is contested then it is necessary to file a lawsuit. The Defendant has the right to respond to the complaint.

New York follows pure comparative fault rules which means that when a jury finds that you are responsible for causing an accident the damages awarded to you will be reduced by the percentage of negligence. This rule is not applicable to owners of vehicles which are rented out or leased to minors.

Duty of Care

In a negligence case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty to exercise reasonable care. This duty is due to all people, however those who operate vehicles owe an even greater obligation to other people in their field. This includes ensuring that they don’t cause motor vehicle accidents.

Courtrooms compare an individual’s actions to what a typical individual would do in similar circumstances to determine what constitutes an acceptable standard of care. In the event of medical negligence expert witnesses are typically required. People with superior knowledge in specific fields could be held to a greater standard of treatment.

A person’s breach of their duty of care may cause harm to the victim or their property. The victim must demonstrate that the defendant did not fulfill their duty and caused the injury or damage that they suffered. Proving causation is an essential part of any negligence case which involves taking into consideration both the real basis of the injury or Motor Vehicle Accident damages, as well as the causal reason for the damage or injury.

If a person is stopped at a stop sign, they are likely to be struck by a vehicle. If their car is damaged, they will be required to pay for repairs. But the actual cause of the accident could be a cut or bricks, which later turn into a potentially dangerous infection.

Breach of Duty

A defendant’s breach of duty is the second element of negligence that must be proved to obtain compensation in a personal injury suit. A breach of duty happens when the at-fault party’s actions do not match what a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances.

For example, a doctor is required to perform a number of professional duties for his patients that are governed by state law and licensing boards. Motorists are required to show care to other drivers and pedestrians to drive in a safe manner and adhere to traffic laws. When a driver breaches this duty of care and causes an accident, he is responsible for the injuries sustained by the victim.

A lawyer may use the “reasonable individuals” standard to establish that there is a duty of prudence and then show that the defendant failed to meet this standard in his actions. It is a matter of fact that the jury has to decide if the defendant complied with the standard or not.

The plaintiff must also prove that the breach of duty of the defendant was the main cause of his or her injuries. This is sometimes more difficult to prove than the existence of a duty or breach. For example, a defendant may have crossed a red line, but it’s likely that his or her actions was not the sole reason for your bicycle crash. Causation is often contested in crash cases by defendants.


In motor vehicle cases, the plaintiff must establish a causal link between the defendant’s breach of duty and the injuries. For instance, if the plaintiff suffered an injury to the neck as a result of a rear-end collision, his or her lawyer will argue that the collision was the cause of the injury. Other factors that contributed to the collision, such as being in a stationary vehicle are not culpable and will not affect the jury’s determination of the degree of fault.

It could be more difficult to establish a causal connection between a negligent act, and the plaintiff’s psychological symptoms. It may be because the plaintiff has had a difficult background, a strained relationship with their parents, or has abused drugs or alcohol.

If you’ve been involved in a serious motor vehicle accident It is imperative to consult an experienced attorney. The lawyers at Arnold & Clifford, LLP have years of experience representing clients in personal injury cases, business and commercial litigation and motor vehicle accident cases. Our lawyers have developed working relationships with independent medical professionals with a variety of specialties, expert witnesses in accident reconstruction and computer simulations as well as with private investigators.


The damages a plaintiff may recover in a motor vehicle lawsuit include both economic and non-economic damages. The first type of damages includes the costs of monetary value that can easily be summed up and calculated into a total, for example, motor Vehicle accident medical treatments, lost wages, repairs to property, or even a future financial loss, for instance loss of earning capacity.

New York law also recognizes the right to seek non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, which cannot be reduced to a dollar amount. However the damages must be proven to exist with the help of extensive evidence, such as deposition testimony from the plaintiff’s close family members and friends medical records, as well as other expert witness testimony.

In cases where there are multiple defendants, courts will often use comparative fault rules to determine the amount of damages that must be divided between them. The jury must determine the amount of fault each defendant has for the accident, and divide the total damages awarded by the percentage. However, New York law 1602 exempts owners of vehicles from the comparative negligence rule in the event of injuries sustained by the drivers of cars or trucks. The analysis to determine whether the presumption is permissive or not is complicated. The majority of the time there is only a clear proof that the owner refused permission to the driver to operate the vehicle can overcome the presumption.